Cases 11 - 20 of 2,091
Chronic Care Advocates, Inc. v. Airtight Design, LLC
as 1:2024cv02078
Plaintiff:
Chronic Care Advocates, Inc.
Defendant:
Airtight Design, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hebert v. Wood
as 1:2024cv01136
Plaintiff:
Lovella E. Hebert
Defendant:
Lucian Lincoln Wood and Lucian Lincoln Wood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gates v. Nalley Chevolet et al
as 1:2024cv01574
Plaintiff:
Henry Louis Gates
Defendant:
Nalley Chevolet, Citizens Bank, Dalia Maisonet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Moore v. Bridgecrest Credit Company LLC
as 1:2024cv02036
Plaintiff:
Travontae Moore
Defendant:
Bridgecrest Credit Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Chappell v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01989
Plaintiff:
David Chappell
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Mercedes-Benz Group, AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Alexander v. Lemon
as 1:2024cv01964
Plaintiff:
Liam Alexander
Defendant:
Olepia Lemon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Citibank N.A. v. McPherson
as 1:2024cv01863
Plaintiff:
Citibank N.A.
Cross Plaintiff:
Vontarris McPherson
Cross Defendant:
RAS Lavrar, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Flynn Lavrar
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
The Mykel Shariff Sanders Estate v. Kramer et al
as 1:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
The Mykel Shariff Sanders Estate
Defendant:
Amanda Kramer, Tomiya Lewis and Desiree Amber Kramer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Gilstrap v. Equifax Information Service
as 1:2024cv01632
Plaintiff:
Sammy E. Gilstrap
Defendant:
Equifax Information Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gilstrap v. HR True Check Inc.
as 1:2024cv01634
Plaintiff:
Sammy E. Gilstrap
Defendant:
HR True Check Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
