Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Nessmith et al v. Altria Group, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00884
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and Altria Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
ERIN NESSMITH and JARED NESSMITH
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Klein v. Duane Morris LLP et al
as 2:2019cv14189
Defendant:
Danielle Rundlett Burns, Duane Morris LLP and Ruth P Clayton
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Klein
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jonathan S. Morris, P.A. et al v. Chamber Approved, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv61105
Plaintiff:
Jonathan S. Morris, P.A. and Broward Psychology, P.A.
Defendant:
Chamber Approved, Inc. , Broward County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. , Miami-Dade County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv60803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Akerman v. magicJack Vocaltec Ltd. et al
as 9:2018cv80310
Plaintiff:
Morris Akerman
Defendant:
magicJack Vocaltec Ltd. , RICHARD HARRIS , YUEN WAH SING and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Powell v. Brown et al
as 6:2017cv00528
Plaintiff:
Pamela Powell
Defendant:
Wanda Leigh Brown, C. David Brown, II, C. David Brown, II, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Blough v. Silberman et al
as 8:2017cv00371
Plaintiff:
Melvin E. Blough
Defendant:
Morris Silberman , Marva Crenshaw and Daniel H. Sleet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ingham v. Lockhart, Morris & Montgomery, Inc.
as 1:2016cv24255
Plaintiff:
Shelton B. Ingham
Defendant:
Lockhart, Morris & Montgomery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas Morris v. Capital One Bank
as 2:2016cv00685
Plaintiff:
Thomas Morris
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
