Cases 151 - 160 of 492
Comins v. U.S. Pipe Fabrication, LLC
as 6:2017cv01844
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Comins
Defendant:
U.S. Pipe Fabrication, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LR Trust v. William Rogers, Jr., et al
as 17-14635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LR TRUST
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM H. ROGERS, JR., PAUL R. GARCIA, M. DOUGLAS IVESTER and others
:
SUNTRUST BANKS, INC.
Molloy v. Boynton et al
as 3:2017cv01157
Plaintiff:
Dave Molloy
Defendant:
Paul G. Boynton, Nancy Lynn Wilson, Hans Vanden Noort and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Delta Subsidiaries, Inc. et al v. Restore Medical Partners, PLLC et al
as 8:2017cv01704
Plaintiff:
Delta Subsidiaries, Inc. , Kevin Hanley and Terry Wilks
Defendant:
Restore Medical Partners, PLLC , Lindsay Job and Jordan Churchill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watson et al v.Vukovich
as 6:2017cv00805
Plaintiff:
Mary Allen, Gordon Kirkland, W. Riley Allen, P.A. Profit Sharing Plan and others
Defendant:
Robert Vukovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitten v. Clarke et al
as 1:2017cv02585
Plaintiff:
Jerrell Whitten
Defendant:
Ronald F. Clarke, Michael Buckman, Joseph W. Farrelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jaynes v. Johns
as 6:2017cv01156
Plaintiff:
Judith A. Jaynes
Defendant:
Thomas L. Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
EMT Properties, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Carolina Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv02023
Plaintiff:
EMT Properties, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant:
Carolina Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mesirov v. Fanning et al
as 1:2017cv01983
Plaintiff:
Judy Mesirov
Defendant:
Thomas A. Fanning , Art P. Beattie , Donald M. James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shorr v. Finizio et al
as 9:2017cv80686
Plaintiff:
David Shorr
Defendant:
Robert G. Finizio, Daniel A. Cartwright, John C.K. Milligan IV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
