Cases 71 - 77 of 77
J & V Charitable Remainder Trust v. Wilson et al
as 9:2007cv80683
Plaintiff:
J & V Charitable Remainder Trust, J & V Charitable Remainder Trust and J & V Charitable Remainder Trust
Defendant:
Harvey J. Wilson, Eugene V. Fife, R. Andrew Eckert and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Hiers v. Wilson et al
as 9:2007cv80611
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Hiers, Michael L. Hiers, Michael L. Hiers and others
Defendant:
Harvey J. Wilson, Eugene V. Fife, R. Andrew Eckert and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Phillips v. Langone et al
as 1:2007cv01066
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Weiss Phillips, Elizabeth Weiss Phillips and Elizabeth Weiss Phillips
Defendant:
Kenneth G. Langone, Robert L. Nardelli, Carol B. Tome and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Gattelaro v. CheckFree Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00945
Plaintiff:
Brad Gattelaro and Brad Gattelaro
Defendant:
CheckFree Corporation, Peter J. Kight and David E. Mangum
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Advantage Investors v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2007cv00842
Plaintiff:
Advantage Investors, Advantage Investors, Advantage Investors and others
Defendant:
Ian J. McCarthy, Ian J. McCarthy, Ian J. McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Vicary v. Langone et al
as 1:2007cv00693
Plaintiff:
Glenn Vicary, Glenn Vicary, Glenn Vicary and others
Defendant:
Kenneth G. Langone, Robert L. Nardelli, Carol B. Tome and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Becnel et al v. Nardelli et al
as 1:2007cv00356
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Daniel E. Becnel, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Robert L. Nardelli, Robert L. Nardelli, Robert L. Nardelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
