Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Reit 11, LLC et al
as 6:2013cv01329
Defendant:
Chase/Freeman, P.A., James Eshelman, Adam Goldstein and others
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Seterus, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00662
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Freeman
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc. , MERSCORP, Inc. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Freeman v. Beneficial Financial I, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02830
Plaintiff:
Anthony Marcellus Freeman
Defendant:
Beneficial Financial I, Inc. , Riverstone Residential Group and THR Georgia, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Freeman v. Beneficial Mortgage Company
as 1:2013cv01722
Plaintiff:
Anthony Freeman
Defendant:
Beneficial Mortgage Company and McCurdy & Candler LLC
Clark v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2012cv03851
Plaintiff:
Fred Clark
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Johnson & Freeman, LLC
Freeman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2012cv02854
Plaintiff:
Roddy Freeman
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Jones et al v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv01111
Plaintiff:
Eric Jones, Hamilton Jones and Essia Jones
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A. , Bank of New York Mellon , CWABS, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Falconer v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2012cv00743
Plaintiff:
Calbert Falconer
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon, Statebridge Company, LLC and Johnson and Freeman, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stanford v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv00516
Plaintiff:
Berneitha W. Stanford
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , JP Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp. , Chase Home Finance, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
FREEMAN v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 3:2012cv00027
Plaintiff:
LUTHER FREEMAN
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
