Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Eakin et al v. Rosen et al
as 7:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOEL EAKIN and NORA KAY EAKIN
Defendant:
FREDERIC A ROSEN and JOHNSON PUBLISHING COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hadden v. Indian River County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2015cv14416
Plaintiff:
David Hadden
Defendant:
Indian River County Sheriff Department, Deryl Loar, Donald Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eakin et al v. Rosen et al
as 2:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
William Joel Eakin and Nora Kay Eakin
Defendant:
Frederic A. Rosen and Johnson Publishing Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Katz v. KMart Corporation
as 9:2015cv80346
Plaintiff:
Scott William Katz
Defendant:
KMart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dibble v. Avrich et al
as 0:2014cv61264
Plaintiff:
Surrogate Dibble
Defendant:
William Avrich and Above Avrich, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Rufur & Williams et al
as 1:2013cv22728
Plaintiff:
Gene Elford Johnson
Defendant:
Rufur & Williams, Michael G. Perez, Joseph Nelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Overcash v. Swigert et al
as 5:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
William Todd Overcash and Carolyn Torrey
Defendant:
Willam Swigert, Barbara Gurrola, Daniel B. Merritt, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COMPUTER SCIENCE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND APPLICATIONS et al v. LATIFI et al
as 3:2012cv00129
Plaintiff:
COMPUTER SCIENCE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND APPLICATIONS and HAMID REZA ARABNIA
Defendant:
SHAHRAM LATIFI , PHASE INC , ZHANG YU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Payne v. Jackson et al
as 6:2012cv01356
Plaintiff:
Rayon Payne
Defendant:
Taurean O'Keith Jackson, Dee "DS" Standfield, Quantin L. McIntosh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv01270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
