Cases 11 - 20 of 128
Smith et al v. Acuity Brands, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Andrew Smith and Mackenzie Fairfield
Defendant:
Acuity Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Antale v. Holiday CVS, L.L.C.,
as 2:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ANTALE
Defendant:
HOLIDAY CVS, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Tidwell v. Gentry
as 8:2022cv02324
Plaintiff:
Andrew Connor Tidwell
Defendant:
Kendall Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anderson v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Melissa Anderson
Defendant:
Andrew J. Clark, Michelle T. Clark, John Doe Entities 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hallak v. SP Plus Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv03025
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hallak
Defendant:
SP Plus Corporation and Westin Hotel Management, L.P. (DE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Smith v. Andrew et al
as 1:2022cv01923
Plaintiff:
Candice Smith
Defendant:
Brian Michael Andrew and Georgia Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Damages for Interception Wire or Oral Communications
Michael Hill v. Michael Barnhart, et al
as 22-11540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDREW BARNHART and MEAGAN RENEE KERNS
Michael Hill v. Chip Klous
as 22-11535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIP ANDREW KLOUS
Mason v. Jeffers et al
as 3:2022cv00500
Plaintiff:
Bennie Roy Mason, Jr.
Defendant:
Brent Andrew Jeffers, CR England, Inc. and C.R. England, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
RIVERA v. TOKAJER et al
as 3:2022cv04921
Plaintiff:
JESUS RIVERA
Defendant:
ANDREW S. TOKAJER, ALEX CHAN, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
