Cases 101 - 110 of 855
Harper et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Carl J Harper, Leon Guy Patterson, Sr, Wayne Earl Paul and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
COTTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11413
Plaintiff:
COREY DEAN EDWARD COTTON and CORY DEAN EDWARD COTTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nolze et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00664
Plaintiff:
William Nolze, Stephen Walter Miller, Randy Paul Miltier and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Thomas Noonan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
TALBOTT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08784
Plaintiff:
JASON DEAN TALBOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SOUNIA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07667
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP DEAN SOUNIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLARKE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07789
Plaintiff:
BRAD DEAN CLARKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LANESE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06607
Plaintiff:
DEAN LANESE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rhadans v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv19714
Plaintiff:
Dean Rhadans
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WELLS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06493
Plaintiff:
DEAN AARON WELLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06151
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DEAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
