Cases 11 - 20 of 204
PIERRE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
REQUITA PIERRE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ADKINS et al v 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
TODD ADKINS, TEMITOPE AMUSA, JULIO AVILA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PIERRE-LOUIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23183
Plaintiff:
PASCAL PIERRE-LOUIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PIERRE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19312
Plaintiff:
LEVASSEUR PIERRE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AERO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PIERRE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16767
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PIERRE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Busby et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Winston Busby, Gerold A Abbott, Russell Ackerman and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
AZOR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13563
Plaintiff:
PIERRE AZOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DORCELY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12907
Plaintiff:
PIERRE DORCELY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11510
Plaintiff:
PIERRE HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10620
Plaintiff:
PIERRE JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
