Cases 81 - 90 of 320
Peruyero et al v. Airbus S.A.S. et al
as 1:2013cv22832
Plaintiff:
Orlando Peruyero
Defendant:
Airbus S.A.S., BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., BAE Systems PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Oneal v. Crane Co. et al
as 0:2013cv61510
Defendant:
Crane Co. , Alfa Laval, Inc , Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Oneal and Linda Oneal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Oneal v. Crane Co. et al
as 0:2013cv61507
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
v. Crane Co.
as 0:2013cv61506
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Gosnell et al v. Moore Handley
as 2:2013cv01241
Plaintiff:
June V Gosnell , Mary N Ramsey , Frances Horton and others
Defendant:
Moore Handley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Lazenberry v. NapoliBern, Ripkashkolnik, Associates, LLP
as 3:2013cv00672
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lazenberry
Defendant:
NapoliBern, Ripkashkolnik, Associates, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Franklin v. Caterpillar Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00888
Plaintiff:
Donna Franklin
Defendant:
Caterpillar Incorporated, Carlisle Companies Incorporated, Honeywell International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Russell et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv20773
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Russell et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 0:2013cv60507
Plaintiff:
Richard Russell and Joanne Russell
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc., A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Russell et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (Successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc.) et al
as 1:2013cv20762
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
