Cases 21 - 30 of 8,401
OShea Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11243
Petitioner:
OSHEA TERRELL JACKSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Kyle Melady v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11186
Petitioner:
KYLE MELADY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ricardo Tull v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11172
Petitioner:
RICARDO TULL
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Bobby Glenn v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11119
Petitioner:
BOBBY GLENN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Josiah Hathaway v. Attorney General, State of Florida
as 24-11130
Petitioner:
JOSIAH HATHAWAY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Brian Constant, III v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11067
Petitioner:
BRIAN CHARLES PIERRE CONSTANT, III
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Daniel Masson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11004
Petitioner:
DANIEL B. MASSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Miles McChriston v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10987
Petitioner:
MILES TIMOTHY MCCHRISTON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Alan Hoffenden v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10929
Petitioner:
ALAN CHRISTOPHER HOFFENDEN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Mario Manborde v. Attorney General, State of Florida
as 24-10843
Petitioner:
MARIO A. MANBORDE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
