Cases 21 - 30 of 1,410
Stephen v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 0:2023cv62304
Plaintiff:
Evert Stephen
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lloyd Joyner v. USA
as 23-13922
Petitioner / Appellant:
LLOYD JOYNER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Daniel Cobble v. USA
as 23-13929
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dontiez Pendergrass v. USA
as 23-13938
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONTIEZ PENDERGRASS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Roosevelt Coats, III v. USA
as 23-13911
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROOSEVELT COATS, III
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BARTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv24699
Petitioner:
EDWARD C BARTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOTOLO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2023cv24709
Petitioner:
PERRY FRANCIS MONTOLO and PERRY FRANCIS MOTOLO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ANY / ALL AGENTS CONTRACTORS EMPLOYEES PRINCIPALS AND THIRD PARTY INTERVENORS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FLEMING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2023cv00459
Petitioner:
STEPHANIE LYNN FLEMING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FCI DANBURY and BALTIMORE RRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. United States Of America
as 1:2023cv23942
Plaintiff:
Miguel Arcangel Hernandez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ward v. Warden, FCC Coleman II
as 5:2023cv00602
Petitioner:
Dustin Ward
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and Warden, FCC Coleman 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
