Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jonathan Riches v. First Advantage Background Svc, et al
as 12-13044
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP., FIRST ADVANTAGE CREDIO LLC, PRIVATE EYES INC. and others
Jonathan Riches v. John Case, et al
as 12-12991
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
JASON CASE, RYAN CASE, JOHN E. CASE, IV and others
Jonathan Riches v. Oscar Valles, et al
as 11-10463
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
OSCAR CAMPILLO VALLES and FCI WILLIAMSBURG
Riches v. Case et al
as 8:2010cv01931
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
John E. Case, Jason Case, Ryan Case and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jonathan Riches v. Pleasant Rowland, et al
as 10-13964
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
PLEASANT ROWLAND and MORGAN ST. JAIL
Jonathan Riches v. Frankie Muniz, et al
as 10-13965
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANKIE MUNIZ and USP COLEMAN
Jonathan Riches, et al v. Irving Picard, et al
as 10-13868
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, a.k.a. Bernard Madoff
Movant - Appellant:
PATRICK J. SIMPSON, RICHARD GALIETTI, ANDRE COWLEY and others
Respondent - Appellee:
IRVING H. PICARD, JOHN SERENO, FBI Special Agent, RICHARD CONKLIN, Captain and others
Jonathan Riches v. Stephen Strasburg, et al
as 10-13244
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, a.k.a. Pete Telesco, a.k.a. Deathwish, a.k.a. Diaz St Pete
Respondent - Appellee:
STEPHEN STRASBURG, GREASEBALLMELIA and HARRY FARRINGTON
Jonathan Riches v. USP Coleman
as 10-13232
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
USP COLEMAN
v. RICHES et al
as 4:2009cv00173
Defendant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent:
ANIL AMBANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
