Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Parrish, Christopher Neil v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv14085
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neil Parrish
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parrish v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv14401
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neil Parrish
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerry Alfred v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13263
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERRY NEIL ALFRED
Respondent / Appellee:
RICKY D. DIXON and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Restricted Filer - Alfred v. Dixon
as 1:2023cv23187
Plaintiff:
JERRY NEIL ALFRED and Jerry Neil Restricted Filer - Alfred
Defendant:
Antony Blinken and Secretary Ricky D Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Neil Walker v. Michael Crespi, et al
as 22-13872
Petitioner / Appellant:
NEIL WALKER
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL CRESPI, FRANCES H. SMITH, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Jeffery Brantley v. Florida Attorney General, et al
as 22-12142
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFERY NEIL BRANTLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL and SECRETARY, DOC
Gillespie v. Marion County Jail
as 5:2022cv00037
Petitioner:
Neil Joseph Gillespie
Respondent:
Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gillespie v. Woods
as 5:2022cv00013
Petitioner:
Neil Joseph Gillespie
Respondent:
Billy Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gillespie v. Marion County Jail
as 5:2021cv00463
Petitioner:
Neil Joseph Gillespie
Respondent:
Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FOWLER v. JOSEPH
as 3:2021cv00828
Respondent:
MV JOSEPH
Petitioner:
JERRY NEIL FOWLER, SR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
