Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Griffith et al v. Integrated Tech Group, LLC
as 0:2019cv61707
Plaintiff:
Melvin Robert Carter, Robert Jasper Griffith, Mark Christopher Row Setal and others
Defendant:
Integrated Tech Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Dozier v. DBI Services, LLC.
as 3:2018cv00972
Defendant:
DBI Services, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Oscar Dozier, Ernest Kelly, Bernard Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SEARS v. CARTER'S PAINTING SERVICES INC
as 1:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
RONALD SEARS
Defendant:
CARTER'S PAINTING SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gudger v. Centene Management Company, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv14281
Defendant:
Sunshine State Health Plan, Inc. and Centene Management Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jody Gudger, Rhonda King, Judith Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Lardin et al v. ETW, LLC
as 9:2017cv80789
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lardin and Lacie Carter
Defendant:
ETW, LLC and Gregg Kuehnel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Maysilles v. Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00682
Plaintiff:
Carter Maysilles
Defendant:
Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nawaz et al v. Dade Medical College et al
as 1:2015cv24129
Defendant:
Dade Medical College, University of Southernmost Florida, Inc. and Ernesto Perez
Plaintiff:
Nancy Nawaz , Idis Sobalvarro , Mariela Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Carter v. Provider Connection, Inc.
as 8:2015cv02291
Plaintiff:
Carissa Carter
Defendant:
Provider Connection, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burden v. KP Care Group, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv01148
Plaintiff:
Marcus Burden
Defendant:
KP Care Group, Inc., Erika Carter and Kayla Anderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DORMINEY v. JAKVILLE INC et al
as 5:2015cv00058
Defendant:
JAKVILLE INC , CARTER AND KOERTGE LLC and JASON KOERTGE
Plaintiff:
JUNE DORMINEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
