Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Post v. United Technologies Corporation et al
as 9:2018cv80294
Plaintiff:
Ryann Post
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation and Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Stuart et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Frank Stuart , Jason Adams , Michael Barnes and others
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wright v. GRC Landcaping II, LLC et al
as 0:2016cv62661
Plaintiff:
Otis James Wright and Melvin Bernard Coleman
Defendant:
GRC Landcaping II LLC , Deon Botha , Daniel Goldstein and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Wright v. B & B Contracting, Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv62020
Plaintiff:
Otis James Wright and Virgil Alan Moody
Defendant:
B & B Contracting, Inc. and Walter Beaton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Otis et al v. Arise Virtual Solutions, Inc.
as 0:2012cv62143
Plaintiff:
Joseph Otis , Tracey Cupp , Ayub Abdul-Haqq and others
Defendant:
Arise Virtual Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Finch v. Otis Elevator Company et al
as 0:2012cv61504
Plaintiff:
Sonia Finch
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company and Julie Brandt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Williams v. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.
as 8:2009cv01984
Plaintiff:
Otis Williams
Defendant:
Ikon Office Solutions, Inc. and Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Turnipseed v. General Storage, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00115
Plaintiff:
James Turnipseed
Defendant:
General Storage, Inc. and Otis D. Blake
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Brown et al v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
as 3:2007cv00024
Plaintiff:
Freida Brown, Freida Brown, Freida Brown and others
Defendant:
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
