Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MACTRUONG et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
DMT MACTRUONG, NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA, KAMALA HARRIS and others
Defendant:
RONALD DESANTIS, WEBSTER BARNABY, CHRIS SPROWLS and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Grace Lakes Florist, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00510
Defendant:
April L. Wood and Grace Lakes Florist, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Minden Pictures, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
In Re: Record Company Infringement Litigation
as 6:2015cv00708
Defendant:
Tim Foley, Naruss Mahakkapong, Samornsri Mahakkapong doing business as Forever and a Day doing business as Forever and a Day North America also known as Nuchie Joe and others
In Re:
Record Company Infringement Litigation
Special Master:
Orran L. Brown
Plaintiff:
Arista Music, Arista Records LLC, Atlantic Recording Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Foley et al
as 6:2014cv01511
Plaintiff:
UMG Recordings, Inc. , Capitol Records, LLC , Sony Music Entertainment and others
Defendant:
Tim Foley, Foley & Company, Inc., The Foley Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
The American Registry of Radiologic Technologists v. Bennett et al
as 8:2009cv01790
Plaintiff:
The American Registry of Radiologic Technologists
Defendant:
Diane Wood Bennett and Limited X-Ray Licensure Course Providers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Rudolph and Me, Inc. v. Timmy Woods Beverly Hills, Ltd. et al
as 8:2009cv00796
Plaintiff:
Rudolph and Me, Inc.
Defendant:
Timmy Woods Beverly Hills, Ltd. and Timmy S. Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Exclusive Wood Doors, Inc. v. AAW, Inc.
as 1:2007cv20106
Plaintiff:
Exclusive Wood Doors, Inc.
Defendant:
AAW, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
