Cases 11 - 20 of 6,590
Brakic v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Sabahudin Brakic
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Michaels v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
Karly M. Michaels
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Cruz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv21341
Plaintiff:
Alexander Cruz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2024cv60918
Plaintiff:
Raenell Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tucker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
Rosena Perkins Tucker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pakita Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-11084
Plaintiff:
PAKITA WRIGHT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Russo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
Vincenzo Russo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Addison v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv14166
Plaintiff:
Graham Christopher Addison
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bisson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Rory Bisson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MAHONE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MAHONE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
