Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cook v. Phillips & Cohen Associates Ltd
as 4:2018cv00965
Plaintiff:
David Cook
Defendant:
Phillips & Cohen Associates Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McKenna v. Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd., Corp.
as 1:2014cv22186
Plaintiff:
Stuart McKenna
Defendant:
Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd., Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Abu Jaber v. Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd., Corp.
as 0:2013cv61467
Plaintiff:
Najla Abu Jaber
Defendant:
Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd., Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
POITEVINT v. PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES, LTD.
as 1:2012cv00146
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN POITEVINT, SR
Defendant:
PHILLIPS & COHEN ASSOCIATES LTD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Padilla v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 0:2011cv60283
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Padilla
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd., Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dewald v. Phillips & Cohen Associates, LTD
as 3:2009cv01074
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Dewald
Defendant:
Phillips & Cohen Associates, LTD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mendez v. Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd.
as 1:2009cv21467
Plaintiff:
Khalilah M. Mendez
Defendant:
Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Renzo v. Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd.
as 1:2009cv20556
Plaintiff:
Aldo Renzo
Defendant:
Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker v. Phillips & Cohen Associates Ltd. et al
as 2:2008cv02383
Plaintiff:
Carlee Walker and Carlee Walker
Defendant:
Phillips & Cohen Associates Ltd. and Shareece Hackett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Phan v. Phillips & Cohen Associates, LTD
as 3:2007cv00849
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Phan
Defendant:
Phillips & Cohen Associates, LTD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
