Cases 151 - 160 of 193
CareMinders Home Care, Inc. v. Kianka et al
as 1:2015cv01224
Plaintiff:
CareMinders Home Care, Inc.
Defendant:
Lori Kianka and Compassionate Care, LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
6069 Barfield Road, LLC v. Southern Perfection Painting, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01098
Petitioner:
6069 Barfield Road, LLC
Respondent:
Southern Perfection Painting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 7
Femasys, Inc. v. Norgenix Pharmaceuticals, LLC
as 1:2015cv01038
Plaintiff:
Femasys, Inc.
Defendant:
Norgenix Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. v. Tintle
as 1:2015cv01042
Defendant:
Jeremy Gerald Tintle
Plaintiff:
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
CareMinders Home Care, Inc. v. Concura, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00890
Plaintiff:
CareMinders Home Care, Inc.
Defendant:
Concura, Inc. , James Dunn and Sonya Dunn
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Healthedge Investment Fund, L.P. et al v. Gremillion et al
as 1:2015cv00871
Plaintiff:
Healthedge Investment Fund, L.P. , Concentric Equity Partners II, L.P. and HE-IOM Affiliates, LLC
Defendant:
Paul Gremillion, Glen Gremillion and Derek Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
CareMinders Home Care, Inc. v. Beck et al
as 1:2015cv00590
Petitioner:
CareMinders Home Care, Inc.
Respondent:
Andrew Beck and High Spirits & TLC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Noble Systems Corporation v. Citadel Contact Systems, Inc.
as 1:2014cv04095
Plaintiff:
Noble Systems Corporation
Defendant:
Citadel Contact Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
CareMinders Home Care, Inc. v. Sandifer et al
as 1:2014cv03573
Plaintiff:
CareMinders Home Care, Inc.
Defendant:
Raven J. Sandifer and Ravenous Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al v. Sullivan
as 1:2014cv03313
Plaintiff:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Robert Roger Sullivan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
