Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Young v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 2:2023cv14170
Plaintiff:
Susan Young
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc. v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 23-11852
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUMPING JACK RETAIL II, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc. v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 0:2023cv60460
Plaintiff:
Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc.
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc. v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 1:2023cv20966
Plaintiff:
Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc.
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc. v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 0:2022cv61443
Plaintiff:
Jumping Jack Retail II, Inc.
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC and 7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Mendez Fuel Holdings LLC et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv22984
Defendant:
SEI Fuel Services, Inc., 7-Eleven, Inc. and Kendall Healthcare Group, LTD
Plaintiff:
Mendez Fuel Holdings 3 LLC, Mendez Fuel Holdings 2 LLC, Mendez Fuel Holdings 1 LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Michael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Francois v. 7 Eleven, Inc.
as 0:2022cv60473
Plaintiff:
Dejacmar Francois
Defendant:
7 Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
7-Eleven, Inc. v. Orlando Empire, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv00502
Plaintiff:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Defendant:
Orlando Empire, Inc. and Orlando Montero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
7-Eleven, Inc. v. Mahaliza, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv62418
Petitioner:
7-Eleven Inc.
Respondent:
Mahaliza, Inc. and Mahliza, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00502
Plaintiff:
Byron Jones and Maryosha L. King
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.