Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lewis v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Davequan Lewis
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
v. Lamas et al
as 1:2019cv20838
Defendant:
Alfred A. Bunge, Jose A. Lamas, Vicente A. Del Rio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lamas v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 1:2019cv20839
Defendant:
Alfred A. Bunge, Vicente A. Del Rio and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
Plaintiff:
Jose A Lamas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kurtz v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 8:2016cv02082
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kurtz
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Testa v. Grossman et al
as 5:2015cv00321
Plaintiff:
Anne Renee Testa
Defendant:
Seth Grossman and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al v. Zalkind et al
as 1:2014cv24545
Plaintiff:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and J.P Morgan Securities LLC
Defendant:
Michael Zalkind and John Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Piguet v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 0:2014cv61075
Plaintiff:
Christine A. Piguet
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanchez et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 1:2014cv20468
Plaintiff:
Irene Sanchez , Amjad Hayaud-Din , Thomas Torres and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warren Henry Automobiles, Inc. v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2011cv24040
Plaintiff:
Warren Henry Automobiles, Inc.
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valerie Williams, et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 10-12937
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VALERIE WILLIAMS, MEGAN BISS, DEBORAH RUIZ and others
Defendant - Appellant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
