Cases 11 - 20 of 63
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. TECH EMPORIUM ENTERPRISES, INC et al
as 1:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Defendant:
TECH EMPORIUM ENTERPRISES INC and JASON A. LEFSTEAD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Microsoft Corporation v. Modified 360, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Modified 360, LLC and Alexander K. Pegues
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Microsoft Corporation v. Tech HQ, Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv62633
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Tech HQ, Inc., Ludy A. Chacon and Frank Zabroski
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Microsoft Corporation v. Your Software Shop, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv14281
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Your Software Shop, LLC and Bridget Doyle
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Microsoft Corporation v. Your Shop Online, LLC et al
as 0:2016cv61568
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Your Shop Online, LLC , Sofway USA, LLC , Robert J. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127
Microsoft Corporation v. Romcorp Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv02350
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Romcorp Inc. and Roman Stefoglo
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Microsoft Corporation v. Excel Computers, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Excel Computers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Microsoft Corporation v. Champion Computer Products, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00649
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Champion Computer Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Microsoft Corporation v. F & F Environmental, Inc.
as 8:2015cv00397
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
F & F Environmental, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Microsoft Corporation v. Avala Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Avala Technology, Inc., Qi Zhang and Jon Shao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
