Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ROSE v. ATMOS NATION LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
SAI ROSE
Defendant:
ATMOS NATION LLC, CHARLY BENASSAYAG, ELI EROCH and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ATMOS NATION, LLC. et al v. Better Life Products, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv62458
Plaintiff:
ATMOS NATION, LLC. and Atmos Technology, LLC
Defendant:
Better Life Products, Inc., MDR Wholesale Group, Jeffrey Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Lacefield Designs, Inc. v. COA, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03747
Plaintiff:
Lacefield Designs, Inc.
Defendant:
COA, Inc. , Lowe's Companies, Inc. , National Furniture Supply LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Lacefield Designs, Inc. v. Stein World Operating Co. et al
as 1:2013cv02057
Plaintiff:
Lacefield Designs, Inc.
Defendant:
Stein World Operating Co. , Aaron Investments, Inc. , Lazy Rest Shops, Ltd and others
Swatch S.A. et al v. Tick Tock, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv23241
Plaintiff:
Swatch S.A. and Swatch Group (U.S.) Inc.
Defendant:
Tick Tock, Inc., International Time, Inc., The Pfeffer Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Bullet Line, LLC v. Bel Incorporated et al
as 1:2009cv23856
Plaintiff:
Bullet Line, LLC, Bullet Line, LLC, Bullet Line, LLC and others
Defendant:
Bel Incorporated, John Doe Corporations 1-10 and John & Jane Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0145 Patent Infringement
Swatch S.A. et al v. Watch Land et al
as 1:2009cv22125
Plaintiff:
Swatch S.A., Swatch S.A., The Swatch Group (U.S.) Inc. and others
Defendant:
Watch Land, Alex Genta, Jorge Pablo Genta and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Mostchoice.com, Inc. v. John Doe Corporation #1 et al
as 1:2007cv02309
Plaintiff:
Mostchoice.com, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe Corporation #1, John Doe Corporation #2 and Netquote, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
