Cases 21 - 30 of 52
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Thornton et al
as 5:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
James Marlon Thornton, Jr, Jamie Brent Thornton, James Dillon Thornton and others
Cross_claimant:
Georgia Department of Revenue
Cross_defendant:
James Marlon Thornton, Jr
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURTIS
as 1:2015cv00097
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
ROBERT H CURTIS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
DAVIS v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
GLENDA F DAVIS
Defendant:
JOHN H DAVIS, TURTLE & HUGHES INC and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
United States of America v. Knopf
as 1:2014cv24470
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kenneth H Knopf
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. McKernan
as 2:2014mc14123
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
James H. McKernan
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TREVITT et al
as 5:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BARBARA B TREVITT, CHARLES B HAYGOOD, JR, JESSIE B HAYGOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Green v. Shulman et al
as 3:2013cv00358
Plaintiff:
Clinton Green, Sr.
Defendant:
Douglas H. Shulman, Linda Stiff and Richard Spires
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6702 IRS: Refund of Income Tax Penalty
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BAXLEY, II et al
as 1:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MILTON H BAXLEY, II and SANDRA G BAXLEY
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
CALLOWAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2012cv00153
Plaintiff:
BELINDA CALLOWAY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DOUGLAS H SHULMAN
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532
USA v. Dieter Klohn
as 11-13819
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DIETER H. KLOHN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
