Cases 121 - 130 of 259
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Randall et al v. Offplan Millionaire AG et al
as 6:2017cv02103
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Randall and Fan Feng
Defendant:
Offplan Millionaire AG, Capinvest LLC, Joachim Oliver Nedela and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Scotto v. U.S. Treasury et al
as 8:2017cv02732
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Defendant:
U.S. Treasury, Dwayne Faulkner, Francisco Aguilar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jordan v. Credit One Bank, N.A.
as 6:2017cv01884
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jordan
Defendant:
Credit One Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Rice et al v. National Credit Systems, Inc.
as 8:2017cv02411
Plaintiff:
Kirby Rice , Tina Rice and Jordan Rice
Defendant:
National Credit Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Watson v. Jordan et al
as 8:2017cv01948
Plaintiff:
Patricia Watson
Defendant:
Yakim Manasseh Jordan and Manasseh Jordan Ministries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Richard Jordan, et al v. GA Dept of Corrections
as 17-12948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JORDAN and RICKY CHASE
Movant - Appellee:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Molitor et al v. Manasseh Jordan Ministeries, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02408
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Molitor , Laura C. De La Cabada, Steve Clarke and others
Defendant:
Manasseh Jordan Ministeries, Inc. and Yakim Manasseh Jordan
Movant:
Kingdom Ministries Church, Inc.
Molitor et al v. Manasseh Jordan Ministeries, Inc. et al
as 1:2017mi00052
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Molitor , Laura C. De La Cabada, Steve Clarke and others
Defendant:
Manasseh Jordan Ministeries, Inc. and Yakim Manasseh Jordan
Movant:
Kingdom Ministries Church, Inc.
Carlos Jordan-Garfias v. U.S. Attorney General
as 17-12098
Petitioner:
CARLOS JORDAN-GARFIAS
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
