Other Statutes Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Bowers v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 5:2017cv00402
Plaintiff: Brien Bowers
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01859
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bowers v. Green Tree
as 5:2016cv00626
Plaintiff: Brien Bowers
Defendant: Green Tree
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Bowers v. Green Tree
as 6:2016cv01786
Plaintiff: Brien Bowers
Defendant: Green Tree
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
In re: Tyrone Bowers
as 16-13799
Petitioner: In re: TYRONE JAMES BOWERS
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Tamiko Walker v. Financial Recovery Services, I, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-13769
Plaintiff - Appellant: TAMIKO P. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee: FINANCIAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC., BRIAN CHARLES BOWERS and JOHN DOE
USA v. Demetrius Bowers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-11585
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DEMETRIUS RENALDO BOWERS, a.k.a. Fat Cat Bowers, a.k.a. Casino Bowers
Domond et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2014cv80399
Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner: Marie Nadege Domond , Clara Ricaurte , Robert Kevin Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
In re: Tyrone Bowers
as 14-10461
Petitioner: In re: TYRONE JAMES BOWERS
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Campbell v. Financial Recovery Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2013cv60517
Plaintiff: Taneike Y. Campbell
Defendant: Financial Recovery Services, Inc. , Brian Charles Bowers , Mark J. Patin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?