Other Statutes Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Matthew Faison, Jr. v. Chief Judge of the Eleventh, et al
as 19-12909
Defendant / Appellee: CHIEF JUDGE OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, STATE ATTORNEY, Katherine Fernandez, Daniel Voredo, John Meyers and FLORIDA PROBATION AND PAROLE COMMISSION, Marcia Hendry
Plaintiff / Appellant: MATTHEW L. FAISON, JR.
Jimmy Teems v. Hugh Wingfield, III, et al
as 19-10931
Defendant / Appellee: PAULA KHRISTIAN SMITH, Senior Assistant, Attorney General, State of Georgia, ROSEMARY F. PHILLIPS, Clerk, Superior Court of Baldwin County, ANDREW GEORGE SIMS, Special Assistant to Attorney General of the State of Georgia and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JIMMY RAY TEEMS
James Tate v. Jorge Labarga, et al
as 19-10631
Defendant / Appellee: R. FRED LEWIS, Justice, BARBARA J. PARIENTE, Justice, PEGGY A. QUINCE, Justice and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES L. TATE
Bey et al v. Foreign Debtor Corporation Operator Employees et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2019mc00014
Respondent: Donald G. Jacobsen, Bert Parsley, Larry Stephen Helms and others
Petitioner: Alief Bey, Affan Bey, Malik Bey and others
Potter v. Florida Bar Association et al
as 9:2017cv80865
Defendant: State Attorney Peter Antonacci, John Doe 1-500, Magistrate Joy B Scherer and others
Plaintiff: Rebecca Potter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
In re: Diep Hoang
as 13-14054
Petitioner: In re: DIEP N. HOANG
Mandamus Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF IRS and CHIEF JUDGE, US TAX COURT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03387
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009mi00446
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?