Cases 11 - 20 of 727
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Licari Family Chiropractic Inc. et al v. Eclinical Works, LLC et al
as 8:2016cv03461
Plaintiff:
Licari Family Chiropractic Inc, Peter Licari and Licari Family Chiropractic Inc.
Defendant:
Eclinical Works, LLC, Eclinicalweb, LLC, John Does 1-10 and others
Not Classified By Court:
Rodney Max
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Goodson & Company, Ltd. Attorneys and Counselors at Law
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Jue v. Whelan et al
as 4:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
Jason Jue
Defendant:
Matthew Whelan and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sawicki v. Loan Depot LLC et al
as 2:2022cv14425
Plaintiff:
Zachary Sawicki
Defendant:
Loan Depot, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
