Cases 11 - 20 of 144
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ricard v. Rob Graham Enterprises, LLC
as 2:2021cv14349
Plaintiff:
JILLIAN RICARD
Defendant:
ROB GRAHAM ENTERPRISES, LLC doing business as 100 INSURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cudnohufsky et al v. Apple Inc
as 5:2021cv00975
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Cudnohufsky, Darina Wynette Beasley, Marina Bromley and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00632
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. James Graham
as 21-12013
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES MARTIN GRAHAM
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
James Ficken, et al v. City of Dunedin, Florida, et al
as 21-11773
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BOWMAN, in his official capacity as Code Enforcement Board Chairman, ARLENE GRAHAM, in her official capacity as a member of the Code Enforcement Board, CITY OF DUNEDIN, FLORIDA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUNCOAST FIRST TRUST and JAMES FICKEN, Trustee, Suncoast First Trust
Hooper v. Digital Media Solutions, LLC
as 8:2021cv00226
Defendant:
Digital Media Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Graham Hooper
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Graham v. Rapid Auto Loans, LLC
as 0:2021cv60049
Plaintiff:
Altrisha Graham
Defendant:
Rapid Auto Loans, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Ismael Ortiz v. Madison CI Warden, et al
as 20-14586
Defendant / Appellee:
GRAHAM, Captain, STALNAKER, Sergeant at Madison Correctional Institution, S. BEARDEN, Assistant Warden at Madison Correctional Institution and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMAEL LUIS ORTIZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
