Cases 11 - 20 of 125
DELGADO et al v. GOLDEN EYE RESOURCES, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv23435
Plaintiff:
LUIS DELGADO, JUAN FEDERICO LESSMAN, SCH CONSULTING INC and others
Defendant:
GOLDEN EYE RESOURCES, LLC, DONALD RUGLEDGE, LESLIE RUTLEDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Corral v. Ramos
as 6:2022cv01752
Plaintiff:
Juan Ruiz Corral
Respondent:
Diley Romero Ramos and Diley Regla Romero Ramos
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Ruiz Corral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
USA v. Juan Carreno-Romero
as 22-11551
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS CARRENO-ROMERO
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Olivares
as 2:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Azucena Romero Olivares doing business as La Estacion Mexican Grill
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Digital Millennium Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv20639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Orso v. Romero-Loaiza
as 8:2021mc00111
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso
Defendant:
Jorge Romero-Loaiza
Interested Party:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Romero v. Irving Tissue Company Limited et al
as 1:2021mi00074
Plaintiff:
Miguel Romero
Defendant:
Irving Tissue Company Limited and Distribution Unlimited, Inc.
Federal Trade Commission v. Romero
as 5:2021cv00343
Defendant:
Frank Romero and Frank Romero doing business as Trend Deploy, Trendeploy, trendeploy, trendeploy.com, Frank Romero Advertising & Uvenuzx
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
