Cases 31 - 40 of 137,997
Pinkans v. Roberts et al
as 8:2024cv01470
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Pinkans
Defendant:
Susan E. Roberts, Allen P. Pegg, Henry D. Kahn and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Elyashiv v. Collins Cash Inc.
as 0:2024cv61039
Plaintiff:
Joshua Elyashiv
Defendant:
Collins Cash Inc. doing business as Smart Business Funding
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Elyashiv v. Collins Cash Inc.
as 0:2024cv61038
Plaintiff:
Joshua Elyashiv
Defendant:
Collins Cash Inc. doing business as Smart Business Funding
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Radiance Technologies Inc v. Baker
as 5:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Radiance Technologies Inc
Defendant:
Jade Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FARSIAN v. ALPHALETE ATHLETICS LLC
as 0:2024cv61027
Plaintiff:
KOUROSH FARSIAN
Defendant:
ALPHALETE ATHLETICS LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. Greenberg
as 0:2024cv61035
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
Charles Greenberg
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
