Cases 31 - 40 of 321
USA v. Alex Saab Moran
as 23-10066
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX NAIN SAAB MORAN
Amicus Curiae:
SIR IVOR ROBERTS, KCMG, FCIL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Weinstein v. Zippy Shell, Incorporated et al
as 6:2022cv02208
Defendant:
Sin City BJ, LLC, Zippy Shell, Incorporated and Zippy Shell of Las Vegas
Plaintiff:
Morris Weinstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. Johnathan Morris
as 22-13764
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHNATHAN NEROY MORRIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Morris v. Lincare Holdings, Inc.
as 8:2022cv02048
Plaintiff:
Janet Morris
Defendant:
Lincare Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wendell O'Neal v. Allstate Indemnity Insurance Company Inc, et al
as 22-11120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDELL DWAYNE O'NEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY INC, MORRIS BART, LLC, CLAUDE E. HUNDLEY, III and others
JOHNSON v. RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY et al
as 4:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Dessie Johnson
Defendant:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA Inc., LIGGETT GROUP LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
