Cases 31 - 40 of 414
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Akula v. Cassidy et al
as 0:2023cv60034
Plaintiff:
Shiva Akula
Defendant:
Bernard Cassidy, Palmetto GBA, LLC, Kelly Melech Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gerow v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 8:2022cv02977
Plaintiff:
Eric Gerow
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, City of Phoenix, Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
The McClatchy Company, LLC v. Kelly et al
as 9:2022mc81814
Respondent:
Robert Kelly, Eryn Learned and Kerry Wano
Petitioner:
The McClatchy Company, LLC
Perdomo v. Department of Human Service, Division of Child Support Services et al
as 1:2022cv04484
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Perdomo
Defendant:
Department of Human Service, Division of Child Support Services, Department of Human Service, Gwinnett County Child Support Service, Kelly Norman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13539
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bushansky v. Evo Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03785
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Evo Payments, Inc., James G. Kelly, Rafik R. Sidhom and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
