Cases 31 - 40 of 930
In RE: Pro Se, Non-Party Submissions Relating to Removal of Fulton County Superior Court Indictment No. 23SC188947
as 1:2023mi00094
In Re:
David Andrew Christenson
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Alspach v. The Joint Corp.
as 8:2023cv02018
Plaintiff:
Andrew Alspach
Defendant:
The Joint Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gera et al v. STERNBERG et al
as 0:2023cv61678
Defendant:
BurgerFi International, Inc., OPHIR STERNBERG, Julio Ramirez and others
Plaintiff:
Samhita Gera and Denish Bhavsar
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Vergales v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 8:2023cv01934
Plaintiff:
Andrew Vergales
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
.Gates v. Yellen et al
as 1:2023mi00078
Plaintiff:
: Andrew-Steven; .Gates
Defendant:
Janet Yellen and Georgia State Tax Commission
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Gates v. Unknown
as 1:2023mi00077
Plaintiff:
:Andrew-Steven; .Gates:
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Lori Patitz, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-12440
Petitioner / Appellant:
LORI MICHELLE PATITZ and ANDREW ROBERT MOODY
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Dimitar Petlechkov v. FEDEX Corporation, et al
as 23-12259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIMITAR PETLECHKOV
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES INC and others
Charles FowlerIn re: Charles Fowler
as 23-12119
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES ANDREW FOWLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lawson v. Nation's Health Group, Inc.
as 9:2023cv80893
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lawson
Defendant:
Nation's Health Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
