Cases 31 - 40 of 4,258
BALL v. DOES 1-X et al
as 4:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ANDREW BALL
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-X, JANE DOES 1-X, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Jean-Elie Charlemagne
as 24-11225
Petitioner:
In re: JEAN-ELIE URIEL CHARLEMAGNE
Respondent:
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, COMMISSIONER, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Taylor v. Centurylink, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W. Taylor
Defendant:
Centurylink, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hoops Corporation et al v. Secretary, U.S. Department of State et al
as 1:2024cv20882
Plaintiff:
Hoops Corporation and Angela Di Porzio
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, Attorney General MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. John Gayden, Jr.
as 24-11139
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN MATTHEW GAYDEN, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Montford v. Pryor, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv20381
Plaintiff:
John Montford
Defendant:
William H. Pryor, Jr., Lanier Anderson, III, Gerald Tjoflat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
