Cases 41 - 50 of 1,284
Brown v. Netspend Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Netspend Corporation and Republic Bank and Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lalor et al v. Costantini et al
as 1:2023cv24771
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Lalor, Josefina Ruiz Luque, Martin Melhem and others
Defendant:
Matias Costantini, Mr. Juan Cruz Talia Brown, Jonathan Culley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Atomic Barber Company, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv02374
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Atomic Barber Company, LLC doing business as Atomic Barber Company and Trevor B. Brown
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Federal Communications Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Gabriel Brown
as 23-13804
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GABRIEL BROWN
Brown v. Miami Dade County et al
as 0:2023cv62092
Plaintiff:
Antonio Tavaris Brown
Defendant:
Miami Dade County, Broward County, Sheriff Gregory Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
USA v. Khourtney Brown
as 23-13635
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KHOURTNEY BROWN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
