Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Michelle Bush v. U.S. Department of Education, et al
as 19-11542
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL PAYMENT CENTER, c/o: Erik Brechboll, PROFESSIONAL BUREAU OF COLLECTIONS OF MARYLAND, INC., U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELLE B. BUSH
Canal A Media Holding LLC, et al v. United States Citizenship, et al
as 19-11193
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KATHY A. BARAN, in her official capacity as Director of the USCIS California Service Center, ELAINE C. DUKE, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CANAL A MEDIA HOLDING LLC and ERICK ARCHILA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01070
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Steven Dukes
as 19-10279
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN DUKES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dukes v. Air Canada
as 8:2018cv02176
Defendant:
Air Canada
Plaintiff:
Mary Dukes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dukes v. The Check Cashing Store
as 2:2017cv00697
Plaintiff:
Cindy Dukes
Defendant:
The Check Cashing Store
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Kocaya v. Duke et al
as 1:2017cv24367
Plaintiff:
David Kocaya
Defendant:
Elaine Duke, Department of Homeland Security and Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
God v. Duke Energy, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01252
Plaintiff:
God
Defendant:
Duke Energy, Inc., Nipsco, Indianapolis Power and Light and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ghahdarjani v. Duke et al
as 3:2017cv01240
Plaintiff:
Ardalan Heshmat Ghahdarjani
Defendant:
Elaine Duke and L. Francis Cissna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
