Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv60690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gomez et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 9:2016cv81848
Plaintiff:
Juan Gomez and Dharma Foundation ,Inc.
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The Law Offices of Shapiro, Fishman & Gache, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gomez et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 0:2016cv62629
Plaintiff:
Juan Gomez and Dharma Foundation ,Inc.
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The Law Offices of Shapiro, Fishman & Gache, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv14435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Real Estate Settlement Procedure (RESPA) Act
Ventura et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 8:2016cv01479
Petitioner:
Rene Ventura and Yolanda Ventura
Respondent:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Shore v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 0:2016cv60125
Plaintiff:
Michael D Shore
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and Phelan Hallinan Diamond and Jones, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 0:2016cv60058
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Queenie Johnson
Mediator:
Samuel L. Heller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
