Cases 51 - 60 of 587
Fredy Hernandez-Diaz v. U.S. Attorney General
as 22-11703
Petitioner:
FREDY HERNANDEZ-DIAZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez v. Cano Health, Inc. f/k/a Jaws Acquisition Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv20827
Plaintiff:
Alberto Gonzalez
Defendant:
Cano Health, Inc. f/k/a Jaws Acquisition Corp., Marlow Hernandez, Brian D. Koppy and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
USA v. Victor Hernandez
as 22-10845
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL HERNANDEZ
Simey Hernandez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 22-10746
Petitioner:
SIMEY ISAAC HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sandra Hernandez-Ortez, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 22-10561
Petitioner:
SANDRA LORENA HERNANDEZ-ORTEZ and ABNER MAYEN-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Pedro Hernandez Sosa
as 22-10434
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PEDRO JAVIER HERNANDEZ SOSA, a.k.a. Javi Karola, a.k.a. Javi Carolina
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Ronald Panella, M.D. et al
as 8:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Ronald Panella, Best Care Medical Group, Inc., Jorge Consuegra and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Nelson Hernandez
as 22-10406
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NELSON COBO HERNANDEZ
Verbena Products LLC v. Hernandez Del Toro et al
as 1:2022cv20218
Plaintiff:
Verbena Products LLC doing business as Beautyvice
Defendant:
Jose Felipe Hernandez Del Toro, Yoan Senaris, TopTrending Products LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
