Cases 71 - 80 of 87
Blair v. Birmingham School Board
as 2:2010mc02524
Plaintiff:
Reddrick Tyrone Blair
Defendant:
Birmingham School Board
Francis et al v. Morgan Keegan & Co Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01624
Plaintiff:
J Timothy Francis , Frances N Francis and James L North
Defendant:
Morgan Keegan & Co Inc, MK Holding Inc, Carter E Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Duncan et al v. Morgan Keegan & Co, Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01563
Plaintiff:
Walter C Duncan , Dice K Lineberry , Francis H Kohn and others
Defendant:
Morgan Keegan & Co, Inc, MK Holding, Inc, Carter E Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
American College of Cardiology, Inc et al v. Sebelius
as 0:2009cv62034
Plaintiff:
American College of Cardiology, Inc, American College of Cardiology, Inc, American College of Cardiology, Inc and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Action to compel U.S. officer to perform duty
Schilleci et al v. Morgan Keegan & Company Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01485
Plaintiff:
Donald J Schilleci, Donald J Schilleci, Mary Anna Schilleci and others
Defendant:
Morgan Keegan & Company Inc, Morgan Keegan & Company Inc, Morgan Keegan & Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv21631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
EB ASSOCIATES INC, et al v. REX LUMBER LLC, et al
as 5:2009cv00163
Plaintiff:
EB ASSOCIATES INC, EB ASSOCIATES INC, EARL M BARKER and others
Defendant:
REX LUMBER LLC, CHRIS BLAIR and CHRIS CLOUD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Murphy v. Indymac Bancorp, Inc et al
as 0:2008cv61745
Plaintiff:
Collin Murphy
Defendant:
Indymac Bancorp, Inc, NetBank, Inc., Michael W. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
