Cases 71 - 80 of 194
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01339
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv14047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carter v. Earthlink Holdings Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv00433
Plaintiff:
Sam Carter
Defendant:
Earthlink Holdings Corp. , Joseph F. Eazor , Susan D. Bowick and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SINGLETARY et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE RURAL ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION et al
as 7:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
MAE SINGLETARY, VICTOR MEYERS and DEBBIE MEYERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE RURAL ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION, ED PEACE, JESSICA KANG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
James Thomas v. Yolanda Smiley, et al
as 16-16836
Defendant:
ALEX MAULDIN, is sued in his individual and official position as janitor for ALCO Management Inc AMO, DY SMITH, is sued in her individual and official capacity, as police officer, YOLANDA SMILEY, is sued in her individual and official position as Manager for ALCO Management Inc, AMO and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EARL THOMAS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Washington v. Ditech et al
as 3:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
Kathy Washington
Defendant:
Ditech and Does 1-10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
