Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Badolato et al v. Palmer Administrative Services, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Wayne Badolato, Dayanna Cavallo and Danny Long
Defendant:
Palmer Administrative Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Anderson et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv02359
Plaintiff:
Kyrima Anderson, Patrick A. Long, II and Kyrimas Heirs Trust
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Christopher Carr, John F. King and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
McNeal v. First American Title Insurance et al
as 1:2024cv00825
Petitioner:
Sonya McNeal
Defendant:
First American Title Insurance and Craig Long, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 7 Petition to compel attendance before arbitrator
Long v. 123 Insurance LLC et al
as 6:2023cv02421
Plaintiff:
Angela Long
Defendant:
123 Insurance LLC and Alejandro Pomareda
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Long v. Symmetry Financial Group, LLC
as 6:2023cv01832
Plaintiff:
Angela Long
Defendant:
Symmetry Financial Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Long v. Florida Insurance Services, Inc.
as 6:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Angela Long
Defendant:
Florida Insurance Services, Inc. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Senior Life Services
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Long v. American Health Reform Solutions, LLC
as 6:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Angela Long
Defendant:
American Health Reform Solutions, LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company doing business as American Health Marketplace
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
USA v. Bradley Long
as 23-10511
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRADLEY DUANE LONG
USA v. Avery Long
as 22-13714
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
AVERY ITEZ LONG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
