Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Muscogee (Creek) Nation, et al v. Buford Rollin, et al
as 21-11643
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL PARKS, POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS, a federally recognized tribe, DAVID VELA, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the National Park Service and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HICKORY GROUND TRIBAL TOWN, GEORGE THOMPSON, Mekko, individually and as traditional representative of the lineal descendants of those buried at Hickory Ground Tribal Town in Wetumpka, Alabama and MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION, a federally recognized Indian tribe
USA v. Jerald Sells
as 21-10208
Defendant / Appellant:
JERALD SELLS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jason Hartman v. Don Fullman et al
as 1:2018cv03130
Defendant:
Lena Sells, Don Fullman, PIP East, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Hartman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Levinton v. Pop Sells, LLC
as 0:2018cv61408
Plaintiff:
Martin Levinton
Defendant:
Pop Sells, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elite Advantage, LLC et al v. Trivest Fund IV, L.P. et al
as 1:2015cv22146
Plaintiff:
Elite Advantage, LLC and Edward E. Sell
Defendant:
Trivest Fund IV, L.P. , Trivest Partners GP, LLC , Trivest Partners IV, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
State of Alabama v. PCI Gaming Authority, et al
as 14-12004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Defendant - Appellee:
PCI GAMING AUTHORITY, BUFORD ROLIN, STEPHANIE BRYAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Jorge Sell
as 13-12546
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE SELL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
