Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Wayne Johnson for Congress, Inc., et al v. Fox News, et al
as 23-10460
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE JOHNSON FOR CONGRESS, INC. and WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FOX NEWS, BRIAN M. KILMEADE and JEREMY C. HUNT
Bushansky v. CatchMark Timber Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03157
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
CatchMark Timber Trust, Inc., Tim E. Bentsen, Brian M. Davis and others
WAYNE JOHNSON FOR CONGRESS INC et al v. HUNT et al
as 4:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
WAYNE JOHNSON FOR CONGRESS INC and WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant:
JEREMY C HUNT doing business as JEREMY FOR GEORGIA, FOX NEWS NETWORK LLC and BRIAN M KILMEADE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Waseem Daker v. Therese Barnes, et al
as 21-13801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
THERESE S. BARNES, HAROLD D. MELTON, DAVID ERICH NAHMIAS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00846
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Brian Casey
as 20-10892
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: BRIAN M. CASEY
Brian Casey v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 20-10061
Defendant / Appellee:
Z. CULPEPPER, Secretary, Department of Corrections Representative, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, A. RALPH, Assistant Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN M. CASEY
Brian Casey v. Federal Public Defender
as 19-12379
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN M. CASEY
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
Brian Casey v. Donna Elm, et al
as 19-12220
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMARA E. THEISS and DONNA LEE ELM
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN M. CASEY
Brian Casey v. Wexford Health Svc., et al
as 19-10602
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTURION HEALTH SVC., ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN M. CASEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
