Other Statutes Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cecil NelsonIn re: Cecil Nelson
as 23-12589
Petitioner: In re: CECIL DEWITT NELSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00646
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In re: Cecil Dewitt Nelson
as 22-11292
Petitioner: In re: CECIL DEWITT NELSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lee County, Florida, et al v. Kimberly Regenesis, LLC, et alIn re: Lee County, Florida, et al v. Kimberly Regenesis, LLC, et al
as 21-14434
Petitioner: In re: LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a Florida political subdivision, FRANK MANN, County Commissioner, JOHN MANNING, County Commissioner and others
Respondent: DAMASCUS TRADING COMPANY, LLC and KIMBERLY REGENESIS, LLC
Cecil Tolbert v. State of Florida, et al
as 21-13928
Petitioner / Appellant: CECIL TOLBERT
Respondent / Appellee: STATE OF FLORIDA and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Green et al v. Monrovia Nursery Company
as 6:2021mc00164
Plaintiff: James M. Green, Cecil M. Green and Rita M. Green
Defendant: Monrovia Nursery Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Bell v. Boozer
as 6:2021mc00135
Plaintiff: Kenneth D. Bell in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com
Defendant: Cecil Boozer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02649
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Cecil Wampler
as 21-11707
Defendant / Appellant: CECIL WAMPLER
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?