Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Beal Bank USA v. EPA Company, LLC
as 1:2015mi00010
Plaintiff:
Beal Bank USA
Defendant:
EPA Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
National Parks Conservation As, et al v. U.S. Department of EPA, et al
as 13-14977
Petitioner:
SIERRA CLUB and NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EPA and ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CF Industries, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00513
Plaintiff:
CF Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
LISA P JACKSON and EPA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
In re: USA, et al
as 10-14535
Petitioner:
In re: USA, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Warden, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR, EPA, Region IV and others
:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES, ADMINISTRATOR OF NATIONAL BANKS, EPA and others
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of, et al v. USA, et al
as 10-14417
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA and FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES
Defendant - Appellant:
USA, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Warden, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR, EPA, Region IV and others
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR OF NATIONAL BANKS, EPA, NEW HOPE SUGAR COMPANY, OKEELANTA CORPORATION and others
USA, et al v. Miccosukee Tribe, et al
as 10-12997
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federall-recognized Indian Tribe and FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES
Defendant - Appellant:
USA, USA, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Warden and others
:
SERVICE
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Miccosukee Tribe, et al v. USA, et al
as 10-12751
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federall-recognized Indian Tribe and FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES
Defendant - Appellant:
USA, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR, EPA, Region IV, Lisa Jackson and others
:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
