Other Statutes Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nadel v. Cardinal Financial
as 1:2021cv04374
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Nadel
Defendant: Cardinal Financial
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv81512
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv81513
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv81514
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Carroll et al
as 0:2016cr60227
Defendant: Brett Nadel, Clifford Carroll, Rhett Gordon and others
Claimant: Keith D. Chambers
Plaintiff: USA
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
as 1:2010mc23467
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Arthur Nadel, Scoop Capital, LLC, Scoop Management, Inc and others
Receiver: Burton Wiand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
as 7:2009mc00002
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Arthur Nadel, Scoop Capital LLC, Scoop Management Inc and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
as 1:2009mc00005
Defendant: Arthur Nadel, Scoop Capital LLC, Scoop Management Inc and others
Receiver: Burton W Wiand
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
as 2:2009mc00003
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Arthur Nadel, Scoop Capital, LLC, Scoop Management, Inc. and others
Receiver: Burton W. Wiand
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nadel et al
as 1:2009mc21553
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Arthur Nadel, Scoop Capital, LLC, Scoop Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Appointment of receiver
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?