Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
City of Warren General Employees' System v. Teleperformance SE et al
as 1:2023cv24580
Plaintiff:
City of Warren General Employees' System, The Michigan Municipal Retirement System, City of Warren General Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Teleperformance SE, Olivier Rigaudy, Daniel Julien and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6 (b) Federal Commodity Exchange Regulation
USA v. Carlos Olivier Cruz
as 23-13167
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS MIGUEL OLIVIER CRUZ
USA v. Carlos Olivier Cruz
as 23-13019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLOS MIGUEL OLIVIER CRUZ
Joseph v. General Conference Corporation of 7th Day Adventist et al
as 1:2023cv21552
Defendant:
GENERAL CONFERENCE CORPORATION OF 7TH DAY ADVENTIST, (CGC), General Conference Corporation of 7th Day Adventist et al and others
Plaintiff:
Lorfils Joseph
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Clement v. Case-Mate, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01052
Plaintiff:
Olivier Clement
Defendant:
Case-Mate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04868
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
