Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Scott v. Lavender Lingerie et al
as 1:2023cv04731
Plaintiff:
Kimberly R. Scott
Defendant:
Lavender Lingerie doing business as Savage X Fenty, Shoe Carnival, Inc., Vitamin Shoppe Global, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Warren Pink v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 21-12640
Petitioner / Appellant:
WARREN PINK
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Royal Palm Properties, LLC v. Pink Palm Properties, LLC
as 21-10872
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROYAL PALM PROPERTIES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
Defendant / Appellant:
PINK PALM PROPERTIES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Salzmann et al
as 6:2020cv01880
Plaintiff:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dayon Wright, Kathyrn Musante, Esquire Carolyn Salzmann and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
3300 Corp.In re: 3300 Corp.
as 20-12923
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: 3300 CORP., d.b.a. Club Pink Champagne and Showgirls
Leon Pugh, Jr. v. William Balish, et al
as 14-10178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEON EDWARD PUGH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BALISH, BETTE BALISH, CHIARA BALISH BARNETT and others
USA v. Ernesto Escobar
as 13-15944
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERNESTO ESCOBAR, a.k.a. Pink Panther, a.k.a. Flaco
Pugh v. Balish et al
as 4:2013cv00219
Defendant:
William Balish, Bette Balish, Chiara Balish Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Edward Pugh, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated v. Pink et al
as 2:2011cv00564
Plaintiff:
Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Defendant:
Mary Ellen Pink, Matthew J. Jallits, Rachel J. Jallits and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
